Search by topic
- archaeology
- architecture
- bricklayer
- Building of Local Interest
- carpenter
- church
- crime
- dressmaker
- fire
- general labourer
- Great Eastern Railway
- listed building
- medieval
- oral history
- Public House
- Rattee & Kett
- Roman
- scholar
- school
- Then and Now
- tudor
- women
- work
- world war one
- world war two
Search by text
41 - 45 Norfolk Street41 (21) Norfolk Street
History of 41 Norfolk Street
1851 (21)
John W Seabrook, 33, bricklayer, b Kent
Elizabeth, 32, b Bottisham
Mary Ann, 13, b Cambridge
George, 12, b Cambridge
Elizabeth, 11, b Cambridge
Emma, 8, b Cambridge
Lucy, 6, b Cambridge
John, 8 mos, b Cambridge
1861?
1871 (20 & 21) Engineers
1881 (20 & 21) Royal Engineers
John Townsend, 51, bootmaker,
Mary, 51,
Annie, 17,
Albert, 12,
Agnes, 10,
1891
Sarah Stretch, 40, grocer, b Cambridge
1900 27.4.1900 Cambridge Chronicle
On Saturday night the Fire Brigade received call to attend a fire at a house occupied by Mrs Stretch, Norfolk Street. Captain Greef and nearly a score of men were promptly on the scene with hose carts, reels and escapes, but happily the outbreak was of a trifling character, caused by clothes being placed too near a fire to air, and the flames were extinguished before much damage was done.
1901
Arthur Dellar, 56, bricklayer, b Cambridge
Emma Tarrant, 39, b Cambridge
Alfred Dellar, 24, son, carter, b Cambridge
Ruth Tarrant, 20, daughter, laundry maid, b Cambridge
1905 Cambridge Independent Press 14/7/1905
BURGLARY IN NORFOLK STREET. Alfred Dellar (28), labourer, pleaded guilty on an indictment for feloniously and burglariously breaking and entering the dwelling house of Emma Tarrant, 41, Norfolk street, and stealing between £8 and £9, the moneys of Emma Tarrant, during the night of June 29th, 1905. Mr. H. St. John Raikes (instructed by Mr. J. E. L. Whitehead) appeared for the prosecution.
Prisoner admitted a conviction for housebreaking in 1895.
Detective-Sergeant Marsh, answering the Recorder, said that since 1895 the prisoner had been away in the army for a time, and he had also done some work. There had been summary convictions since then, but nothing for dishonesty. The money stolen had been spent with some thieving associates. There were five or six of them in that neighbourhood that gave a lot of trouble to the police.
Prisoner said he was very sorry, but he had had drink at the time, and he did not know what he was doing when he was in drink. He asked for ‘another chance.’
The Recorder said he would presume that prisoner had earned an honest living since 1895. It was also in his favour that the house was uninhabited when he broke into it, and he knew it. He also understood that in some way he was related to the woman whose house he entered. He hoped that when he came out again he would keep out of the hands of the police. He thought the justice of the case would be met by a sentence of seven calendar months’ imprisonment with hard labour.
1913
Samuel Maltby, robemaker
1939
Lilian R McCrory, b 1897
?
?
1962
Dennis B Taylor
Contribute
Do you have any information about the people or places in this article? If so, then please let us know using the Contact page or by emailing capturingcambridge@
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
